项目评审

Program review is a systematic process that occurs every five-to-seven years in order to evaluate and improve academic programs. 项目评审s have several sections that include: background and meaning of the degree, quality of the program, data to support the viability of the program, assessment results from the past five years, and a quality improvement plan. The report, which the process provides, is also reviewed by an external reviewer and by the 促进学生学习委员会（ASLC） as an internal reviewer. The ASLC provides feedback which the programs use to draft a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which could include curriculum and programmatic changes and informs planning and budgeting processes at various levels. 项目评审 is a required practice for accreditation and speaks to the quality and integrity of programs, as one of the criteria for review for WASC Senior College and University Commission reaffirmation. 自2003年以来，项目审查一直是佩珀代因大学评估周期的一部分。 OIE supports program reviews and serves as the repository for five-to-seven-year reviews. 计划审查将是实质性计划变更的基础来源。请参阅世界动物卫生组织的《项目审查指南》。（另外，请参见下文了解更多关于ASLC的信息。）

欲了解更多信息，请点击以下链接：

学术部门项目审查指南
学术项目评审准则
学生事务和其他非学术部门的项目审查指南
ASLC非学术项目审查准则
评估和项目评审报告流程图信息
Did you know the OIE has 基金 to help through program review?

时间表及档案

按年安排

按节目安排

存档

促进学生学习委员会（ASLC）

The 促进学生学习委员会（ASLC） was developed to instill and sustain a culture of systematic student learning assessment in all quarters of the University. The ASLC serves as the internal review board of program reviews and offers programs undergoing 5-year program reviews with feedback on the quality of their critical inquiry process and use of evidence to support their program improvement plan.

Learn more about the ASLC on their 网站!
The OIE/ASLC对比信息图 details some of the key differences between the OIE and the ASLC regarding their roles in assessment and program review.
Each year, the ASLC compiles Flash的报告 of themes identified in their review of program review reports.

周期

pr cycle

第一步：项目评审草案

The first component of the seven‑year program review is referred to as a self‑study and is conducted by the faculty and/or staff who are directly involved with the program. This process is data driven with the annual assessments serving as the foundation for the program review, as well as retention and enrollment data, and educational effectiveness indicators (EEIs).

第二步：外部评估

Each program must undergo an external review by distinguished colleagues outside the University who are familiar with the field, discipline, or profession undergoing a program review.

第三步：修改项目回顾（可选）

Revisions can be made to the program review at this time based on feedback from the external review team.

第四步：内部评估

The internal review process is conducted by the ASLC, a panel of University colleagues, who review and offer feedback on the assessment of learning outcomes. ASLC provides recommendations for program improvement that surface from the program's self‑study and the input of the external review team.

第五步：提交项目评审

The program review, Including the external reviewer team's report and the Quality Improvement Plan, goes both to the Dean and ASLC.

第六步：谅解备忘录

The Dean and program faculty negotiate a MOU that delineates the agreed up recommendations, plan of action, and timeline for meeting the program needs. The Dean is the primary source for monitoring the agreement. ASLC may request a progress report, prior to the next program review, on the assessment of student learning.

第七步：监控进度

The University Planning Committee (UPC) and the President's Cabinet set priorities for planning and budgeting with the 院长. When the program review results in budgetary requests that cannot be funded at the school level, a proposal will then go to UPC for their consideration. If curricular changes are the result of the program review, they must be approved at the school level and then by the University Academic Committee (UAC).

华体会体育

项目评审

时间表及档案

促进学生学习委员会（ASLC）

周期